Individual
The person repeats useful patterns and uses prompts, checks, and workflow steps on purpose, while still learning the limits.
Promising prompts, checks, or workflow steps are becoming deliberate. Reliability still varies by context, person, or consequence, so the next task is to make the pattern testable and safer to reuse.
The person repeats useful patterns and uses prompts, checks, and workflow steps on purpose, while still learning the limits.
The team has repeatable patterns in parts of the work, but quality still depends on who is involved and how the handoff occurs.
Some practices are repeatable, but adoption, controls, and reliability remain uneven across functions.
A successful example is not yet a reliable operating standard. Test the pattern across representative conditions.
Templates or checklists help translate recurring work into a clear task and outcome.
Source boundaries, assumptions, and constraints are documented well enough to repeat the work.
Review is matched to consequence, with known failure modes and explicit human checks.
The AI step fits a selected workflow rather than sitting beside the work as an optional trick.
Ownership, handoff context, disclosure, and escalation are visible to the people involved.
Corrections and near misses are captured so the pattern improves instead of merely being repeated.
Treating one successful pilot as proof of reliability. Variation is the signal to investigate, not an inconvenience to hide.
The pattern works across representative contexts, controls are documented, correction load is understood, and another person can use the workflow without reinventing it. Continue to Integrating, or take the assessment.
Use the AAOS stages to connect the pattern to repeatable grounding, validation, and ownership.